020 7650 1200

Waste Incinerator 2

Judicial review hearing over carbon emissions levels permitted under UK’s new emissions trading scheme

A judicial review hearing will be held on Wednesday 14 April and Thursday 15 April 2021 over the volume of carbon emissions permitted and the exclusion of waste incinerators from the UK’s new emissions trading scheme.  

Posted on 12 April 2021

The High Court hearing will be held remotely. 
Georgia Elliott-Smith, a waste industry expert and environmental consultant, is challenging the four governments of the UK over their joint decision to omit municipal waste incinerators from the scheme that has replaced the EU emissions trading scheme since January 2021. The emissions from incinerators are equivalent to approximately 5.4 per cent of the entire volume of greenhouse gas emissions covered by the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS).
She argues that the cap on the volume of emissions permitted under the emissions trading scheme is too high and was chosen for the improper purpose of ensuring that the UK’s exit from the EU would be smoother.
Represented by Leigh Day solicitors, as well as David Wolfe QC at Matrix chambers and Ben Mitchell at 11KBW chambers, Georgia argues that in setting up the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS), the governments did not consider the short and medium-term aspects of the UK’s obligations under the Paris Agreement which requires substantial and immediate emission reductions, not just net zero by 2050.
Georgia’s case is that the Climate Change Act 2008 grants the power to set up the UK ETS to limit greenhouse gas emissions, not to set an emissions cap to facilitate a smoother withdrawal from the EU.
The cap on the UK ETS in its first year will be 156 mtCO2e, substantially higher than the projected ‘business-as-usual’ emissions of 126-131 mtCO2e for 2021.
Georgia Elliott-Smith said:
“In its current form, it could take nine years before the UK emissions trading scheme reduces carbon emissions by a single gram. In omitting major polluters and setting allowances well above business-as-usual levels, the government has failed to meet its Paris Agreement commitments. I look forward to challenging the Secretary of State for BEIS in court to demand he implement the sort of ambitious policies that the climate crisis demands.”
Leigh Day solicitor Rowan Smith added:
“Our client’s legal case is extremely timely, given all eyes are on the UK government to set an ambitious example at the COP26 climate change conference scheduled for the end of this year. Her arguments are clear: a scheme set up without proper consideration of either the need to apply downward pressure on emissions, or the nearer-term aspirations of the Paris Agreement, is unlawful and should be redesigned.”

Rowan Smith
Climate change Environment Human rights Judicial review Planning Wildlife

Rowan Smith

Rowan Smith is a senior associate solicitor in the human rights department.

Landing Page
Lewisham Hosp Protest Simon Way

Human rights

If you believe your human rights have been denied our human rights and civil liberties team is one of the leading teams of practitioners in this specialist area in the country.

News Article
Waste Incinerator 2
Environment Brexit

Legal challenge to exclusion of waste incinerators from post-Brexit emissions trading scheme

A legal challenge has been issued to the Government's decision to exclude municipal waste incinerators from the UK Emissions Trading Scheme which will replace the existing EU Emissions Trading Scheme after the UK leaves the EU.