Carolin Ott
Senior associate solicitor
Carolin Ott is a senior associate solicitor in the human rights department.
Carolin Ott is a distinguished senior associate solicitor at Leigh Day, specialising in public law with an emphasis on judicial review and public inquiries. Her expertise spans domestic and international human rights cases, in which she has consistently challenged public bodies on key issues such as social welfare, immigration, and national security. Carolin has acted in some of the most high-profile challenges to flagship government policies in recent years, including in the social security and asylum context. She also represents Core Participants in the Covid-19 Inquiry.
Legal expertise
Carolin is a dual qualified lawyer, admitted as a solicitor in England & Wales and as an attorney to the New York State Bar. She has experience working on domestic and international human rights law cases. Carolin joined Leigh Day in 2018 after working in the public law department of a large legal aid firm and for the Law Centres Network. Prior to this, she worked for the Office of the Prosecutor at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia in The Hague.
Carolin graduated from the London School of Economics with a First Class degree in Law. She also holds a Master of Laws from Harvard Law School.
what the directories say
Carolin Ott is phenomenally intelligent and engaged on the legal side of her cases, yet combines that with people skills that make her client-handling, and her management of cases with vulnerable clients, second to none.
Legal 500, 2026
Carolin is a real rising star. She is lovely with clients and is a great hands-on lawyer.
Chambers and partners, 2026
Carolin Ott is exceptional. She is highly intelligent, has great attention to detail, and a great ability to take control of complex cases.
Legal 500, 2025
I cannot praise Carolin's efficiency, understanding, commitment and flexibility highly enough.
Chambers and partners 2025
Key cases:
Some of Carolin’s most notable cases include:
-
LL & AU v Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council – a successful challenge on behalf of residents to Trafford local authority’s council tax reduction scheme. The High Court found the scheme to have been unlawfully adopted and discriminatory.
-
Representing Oxfam in its intervention in a judicial review of the Government’s continuing approval of arms sales to Israel.
-
Representing the family of Agnes Wanjiru regarding the failure to investigate her murder by British Soldiers in Kenya.
-
Representing Asylum Aid in challenges to the lawfulness of the Home Secretary’s policy of removing asylum seekers to Rwanda.
-
Freedom from Torture v Secretary of State for the Home Department – a successful challenge to the Home Secretary’s policy of turning around small boats and diverting them from UK territorial waters into French territorial waters (commonly referred to as the “pushback” policy).
-
Representing TP and AR in a series of successful challenges in respect of the transitional provisions within the Universal Credit regime, for benefits claimants previously entitled to the Severe Disability Premium and Enhanced Disability Premium when in receipt of legacy benefits.
-
R (Nichola Salvato) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions – representing a single mother challenging the rule requiring proof of payment from working parents before they can receive childcare costs support through UC, which put families in hardship and debt. The High Court held that the rule was discriminatory and irrational, and found that it had disproportionately prejudicial effects on women. The matter is ongoing before the European Court of Human Rights.
-
R (Coughlan) v Minister for the Cabinet Office - representing Essex resident Neil Coughlan in his Supreme Court appeal testing the legality of the government’s intention to run pilots in local elections, as part of a broader plan to introduce a requirement to show identification to vote.
-
Representing John’s Campaign and others in relation to unlawful refusals to allow visiting in care homes in circumstances where the suspension of visits had a catastrophic effect on residents, particularly those with dementia. Subsequently, representing Core Participants John’s Campaign, Care Rights UK and the Patients Association in Modules 2, 3 and 6 of the UK Covid-19 Inquiry.
-
RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions – a successful appeal to the Supreme Court on behalf of RR relating to the application of the bedroom tax in which the Supreme Court confirmed that social welfare tribunals and local authorities have the power and duty to dis-apply regulations where applying them would result in a breach of human rights.
Carolin Ott in the news
-
Carolin was featured as the Law Gazette’s Lawyer in the News as a result of her successful challenge to Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council’s council tax scheme.
-
Council tax reduction scheme “unlawfully adopted” and “discriminatory” against disabled people, High Court rules Local Government Lawyer 24.09.2025
-
UK government faces legal action over not evacuating critically ill children from Gaza The Guardian 20.07.2025
-
Carolin was listed as an ‘Associate to Know’ as a result of acting on behalf of Oxfam in Al Haq v Secretary of State for Business and Trade which was identified as one of the top cases of 2025.
-
Blind South London doctor denied right to vote independently wins payout from council My London 11 March 2025.
-
Carolin was recognised as the Times Lawyer of the Week as a result of her work on R (Nichola Salvato) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions.
Accreditations
-
Ranked by Chambers and Partners as a ‘Star Associate’ in Administrative & Public Law and as an ‘Associate to Watch’ in Public Inquiries
Accreditations
Ranked in Chambers 2025
Chambers and Partners 2026
News and blogs
Victory for Trafford residents as High Court rules council tax reduction scheme unlawful
Two Trafford residents have won their High Court legal challenge against Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council’s recently-introduced council tax reduction scheme.
UK government faces legal challenge over position not to evacuate critically ill children from Gaza
A legal challenge is being launched against the UK government on behalf of critically ill children from Gaza who require urgent medical attention, claiming it has failed to consider the situation on the ground in Gaza when turning down calls for the medical evacuation of Gazans requiring treatment to the UK.
Settlement agreed with Croydon Council to improve voting accessibility for blind voters
Dr Yusuf Ali Osman, who is registered blind, has reached a settlement with Croydon Council after challenging it for failing to make reasonable adjustments to make postal voting more accessible for him.
‘Pandemic exposed existing issues in healthcare’: closing submissions made to Module 3 of the UK Covid-19 Inquiry
John’s Campaign, Care Rights UK and the Patients Association have called for a new right in law to a Care Supporter for people across all health and care settings.
