020 7650 1200

Badger

Legal challenge against badger culling licences given green light to proceed

A legal challenge by wildlife groups the Badger Trust and Wild Justice against the granting of badger culling licences has been given permission to be heard in the High Court.

Posted on 16 May 2025

A legal challenge by wildlife groups the Badger Trust and Wild Justice against the granting of badger culling licences has been given permission to be heard in the High Court.

The 26 supplementary licences were granted by Natural England against advice from its own scientists and allowed farmers to kill badgers between June and November 2024.  

The Badger Trust and Wild Justice argue that the licences were granted unlawfully to help maintain the confidence of the farming community, rather than for the proper purpose in law of preventing the spread of disease.  

Applications for the 26 culling licences were submitted to Natural England in February 2024. After considering the applications in April, Natural England’s director of science concluded that following four years of intensive badger culls, alternatives such as a vaccine meant that there was no requirement for further culling. 

The conclusion stated that there was “no justification” for issuing the licences, and that a vaccination could be successfully deployed. 

However, officials from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) advised that the licences not being granted could negatively impact Defra’s relationship with the farming industry.  

Defra officials advised Natural England that abrupt policy changes would “seriously undermine” its ability to work constructively with the farming industry on disease control. 

Following this advice from Defra, in May 2024 Natural England decided to grant the supplementary licences for the period 1 June to 30 November, contrary to the advice of its director of science.  

The Badger Trust and Wild Justice, represented by law firm Leigh Day, launched a judicial review challenge against Natural England’s decision to grant the licences in August 2024.  

Following a renewal hearing in May 2025, a judge granted permission for the claim to continue in the High Court on all grounds.  

The grounds of claim are:  

  • Natural England unlawfully exercised the statutory power to issue licences to kill badgers for the improper purpose of maintaining farmers’ confidence in the Secretary of State’s policy, rather than for the narrower (and proper) purpose of “preventing the spread of disease”. 
  • Natural England had considered arguments that were legally irrelevant to its decision on whether to issue the licences. These included the consequences of the decision for its relationships with Defra and the “farming community”, and for its own budget and the wellbeing of its staff.   
  • Natural England failed to provide adequate and rational reasons as to why the licences should be issued after its director of science had advised that there was no scientific justification for issuing the licences.

The judicial review hearing is expected to be later this year.  

Nigel Palmer, CEO of the Badger Trust said: 

“This is a landmark decision that casts doubt on Natural England’s ability to act in the interest of nature and wildlife. 

“The 2024 supplementary cull licences should not have been issued against Natural England’s own advice leading to the death of thousands more badgers.  

“This must mean the end of issuing any further badger cull licences in any part of England and the Badger Trust now calls on the government to end the culls now”.  

Dr Ruth Tingay, Co-Director of Wild Justice said:  

“Although our legal challenge relates specifically to the 2024 cull licences, today’s decision puts Natural England in a very difficult situation if it is considering using the same reasoning to issue more badger cull licences in 2025, now there is a big question mark over the legality of the 2024 licences. It would be sensible for Natural England to defer any decision about future cull licences until this case concludes”. 

Chris Packham, Co-Director of Wild Justice said:  

“The science says ‘no’, the chief scientist therefore said ‘no’, but Defra said ‘yes’, and thousands of badgers were unnecessarily and cruelly killed. Just to keep farmers ‘happy’. It’s despicable and we will demand justice and fully expose the truth about these agencies’ weaknesses and abject disregard for ethical practices. It’s time we used the facts to make those who cherish the remnants of our wildlife happy. And we will.” 

Leigh Day solicitor Julia Eriksen said: 

“We are pleased our clients have been given permission to proceed with this claim. Natural England’s decision to issue the 26 supplementary badger culling licences went against advice from its own director of science. Our clients say that this was done unlawfully in an effort to maintain the government’s relationship with the farming community, rather than the purpose of controlling disease. We now look forward to progressing this claim on behalf of our clients, the Badger Trust and Wild Justice.” 

Profile
Julia Eriksen
Climate change Environment Human rights Planning

Julia Eriksen

Julia is an associate solicitor in the human rights team

News Article
Fields and countryside
Environment

Wild Justice starts legal proceedings against Government’s controversial Planning and Infrastructure Bill

Conservation campaign group Wild Justice has written to the government calling on it to correct a statement made in Parliament about the controversial new Planning and Infrastructure Bill.

News Article
Aeroplane Descending
Environment Airport Judicial review

Legal opposition launched against Luton airport expansion

The campaign group Luton and District Association for the Control of Aircraft Noise (LADACAN) has taken the first step towards a legal challenge to the expansion of London Luton Airport, arguing that development consent for the proposed development was granted unlawfully.