Quantcast

020 7650 1200

High Court

Campaigners and MPs to consider appeal of Russia Report decision

Campaign group the Citizens and several MPs are considering an appeal of the decision handed down by the High Court yesterday.

Posted on 23 June 2021

Campaign group the Citizens and several MPs will consider an appeal of the decision handed down by the High Court yesterday to refuse permission for a judicial review of the government’s decision not to act on the findings of the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) of Parliament that Russia has interfered in UK electoral processes.

The permission for judicial review hearing was heard today and judgment handed down immediately after. Further information about the details of the case can be found here [link to previous release].

The Citizens and the group of cross-party parliamentarians were asking for the judicial review on the grounds that the government’s inaction breaches its obligations under Article 3 of Protocol 1 (A3P1) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) which protects each citizen’s right to free and fair elections.

But the judge, Mr Justice Swift, said there was no “arguable case” and declined permission. He suggested there was no difference between “a shock jock” spreading misinformation and an attack on an election by a foreign state.

Clara Maguire, executive director for the Citizens:

“The judge’s comparison of an attack by a hostile foreign state to a misinformation spread by a shock jock was an extraordinary suggestion. The only way in which a shock jock could be considered the same as the Kremlin is if shock jocks went around Novichocking their listeners. This shows a complete lack of understanding of the nature of information warfare and the kind of attacks our democracy is facing. This false equivalence is not only ridiculous but dangerous. We are determined to fight on and take this to Strasbourg if necessary.”

Tessa Gregory, partner at law firm Leigh Day who is assisted by associate Tom Short and paralegal Rhiannon Adams, said:

“Our clients are very disappointed by the court’s decision. They continue to believe that the Prime Minister’s failure to investigate Russian interference in our electoral processes places the government in breach of its legal duty to safeguard our democracy and our right to free and fair elections. They are considering an appeal to continue their legal fight to protect the integrity of our democracy”

 

This article was updated on 24 June 2021 at 14:10.

Find out more

Landing Page
Lewisham Hosp Protest Simon Way

Human rights

If you believe your human rights have been denied our human rights and civil liberties team is one of the leading teams of practitioners in this specialist area in the country.

News Article
High Court London
Russia Judicial review

Campaigners and MPs seek permission for judicial review of Russia Report

Campaign group and a number of MPs are seeking permission for a judicial review of the government’s decision not to act on the findings of the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament that Russia has interfered in UK electoral processes.

Meet the legal team

Profile
Tessa Gregory
Corporate accountability Human rights Judicial review Planning Wildlife

Tessa Gregory

Tessa is an experienced litigator who specialises in international and domestic human rights law cases

Profile
Tom Short
Climate change Corporate accountability Environment Human rights Judicial review Planning Wildlife

Tom Short

Tom Short is a senior associate solicitor in the human rights department.